Speaker summary
65%8 analyzed articles/videos171.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Iran's military results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Self-Serving Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 42.3% saturation with 83 hits. Analysis detected 323.551 faulty-reasoning hits from 171.667 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 22.3% and a BS Rank of 36% (18,144 of 28,364 speakers). This Iran's military is better (less manipulative) than 64.00% of the peer group.
Iran's military

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

36% percentile
025507510036.0% percentile
22.3% BS Score8 analyzed videos171.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 32.8%32.8%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 30.1%30.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 26.9%26.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 42.4%42.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 7.1%7.1%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Speaker 13.4%13.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 12.7%12.7%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 12.7%12.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 22.3%22.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 42.4%, sitewide 26.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 32.8%, sitewide 3.3%Ad Hominem: Speaker 30.1%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 26.9%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 22.3%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 19.2%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 13.4%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 12.7%, sitewide 0.8%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 12.7%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate