OPB⁠4%

2 U.S. service members killed, 1 missing after Iranian attack in Jordan ⁠51%

By Chandelis Duster⁠40%

7/18/2026, 9:12:01 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 16 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Pessimism Bias, and Unattributed Quote, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 54% saturation with 170 hits. Analysis detected 767 faulty-reasoning hits from 315 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 51% and a BS Rank of ⁠51% (10,362 of 21,165 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 51.00% of the article peer group.

Two U.S. service members were killed, one is missing and four others were medically evacuated after Iranian attacks on in Jordan on Friday, according to the U.S. military. 
The four American service members who were evacuated to Jordanian hospitals have since been discharged, U.S. 
Central Command said in a social media post on Saturday. 
“Out of respect for the families, CENTCOM will withhold additional information, including the identities of the fallen warriors, until 24 hours after the next of kin have been notified,” it added in the statement. 
Iran’s military said it struck the Muwaffaq Salti Air Base, a key installation used by Jordanian and U.S. coalition forces. 
Sixteen U.S. service members have been killed and more than 430 wounded since the war with Iran began. 
The U.S. and Iran have widened the scope of targets in the latest strikes and the escalation has led to broader concerns that there could be an all-out war amid the fighting for control over the Strait of Hormuz. 
Iran has closed the strait and the U.S. military said it has reinstated a naval blockade of Iran. 
U.S. forces ended its seven planned nights of strikes against Iran on Friday night, according to CENTCOM. 
Underground weapons storage and surveillance sites were among the Iranian assets that were struck, CENTCOM said. 
Iran’s Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamene on Saturday warned the U.S. that it would face “unforgettable lessons” if it continued its attacks, according to the Associated Press. 
On Friday, authorities in Bahrain, Kuwait and Qatar — a mediator in talks to end the war — said their air defense systems were intercepting hostile attacks. 
Jordan held off those attacks, according to its state media. 
Iranian strikes were also reported in Iraq’s Kurdistan region, where at least eight opposition fighters were killed, according to a Kurdish Iranian opposition group. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 8.6%Chandelis Duster: 1.6%Associated Press: 1.8%Confirmation Bias8.6%This article: 0.0%Chandelis Duster: 0.6%Associated Press: 0.6%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 10.8%Chandelis Duster: 2.3%Associated Press: 2.7%Availability Heuristic10.8%This article: 0.0%Chandelis Duster: 0.6%Associated Press: 0.6%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Chandelis Duster: 0.2%Associated Press: 0.3%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chandelis Duster: 1.5%Associated Press: 0.9%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 12.4%Chandelis Duster: 4.2%Associated Press: 4.8%Framing Effect12.4%This article: 0.0%Chandelis Duster: 0.4%Associated Press: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Chandelis Duster: 0.1%Associated Press: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chandelis Duster: 0.1%Associated Press: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Chandelis Duster: 3.5%Associated Press: 2.5%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 20.6%Chandelis Duster: 1.1%Associated Press: 2.1%Pessimism Bias20.6%This article: 27.3%Chandelis Duster: 8.6%Associated Press: 6.5%Negativity Bias27.3%This article: 3.2%Chandelis Duster: 1.1%Associated Press: 1.4%Self-Serving Bias3.2%This article: 0.0%Chandelis Duster: 0.8%Associated Press: 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Chandelis Duster: 0.2%Associated Press: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chandelis Duster: 1.8%Associated Press: 1.1%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 7.6%Chandelis Duster: 1.1%Associated Press: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias7.6%This article: 0.0%Chandelis Duster: 1.1%Associated Press: 1.6%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Chandelis Duster: 0.1%Associated Press: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Chandelis Duster: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Chandelis Duster: 1.4%Associated Press: 1.0%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 5.4%Chandelis Duster: 0.3%Associated Press: 0.1%Primacy Effect5.4%This article: 0.0%Chandelis Duster: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chandelis Duster: 3.8%Associated Press: 0.3%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Chandelis Duster: 0.2%Associated Press: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 54.0%Chandelis Duster: 5.3%Associated Press: 3.6%Appeal to Authority54.0%This article: 12.4%Chandelis Duster: 1.4%Associated Press: 0.9%False Dilemma12.4%This article: 0.0%Chandelis Duster: 0.4%Associated Press: 0.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Chandelis Duster: 0.4%Associated Press: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 7.6%Chandelis Duster: 3.6%Associated Press: 2.4%Hasty Generalization7.6%This article: 0.0%Chandelis Duster: 0.4%Associated Press: 0.0%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Chandelis Duster: 0.3%Associated Press: 0.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 8.3%Chandelis Duster: 6.1%Associated Press: 3.5%Appeal to Emotion8.3%This article: 0.0%Chandelis Duster: 0.7%Associated Press: 0.4%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Chandelis Duster: 1.5%Associated Press: 1.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Chandelis Duster: 0.1%Associated Press: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Chandelis Duster: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Chandelis Duster: 0.1%Associated Press: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Chandelis Duster: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Chandelis Duster: 1.7%Associated Press: 1.2%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Chandelis Duster: 0.1%Associated Press: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Chandelis Duster: 1.0%Associated Press: 0.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Chandelis Duster: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Chandelis Duster: 0.2%Associated Press: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Chandelis Duster: 0.3%Associated Press: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Chandelis Duster: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Chandelis Duster: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 19.0%Chandelis Duster: 1.3%Associated Press: 1.5%Unattributed Quote19.0%This article: 19.0%Chandelis Duster: 1.6%Associated Press: 0.6%Quote-first Misdirection19.0%This article: 16.5%Chandelis Duster: 1.4%Associated Press: 2.8%Biased Writer Voice16.5%This article: 10.8%Chandelis Duster: 1.8%Associated Press: 1.2%Indoctrination10.8%This article: 0.0%Chandelis Duster: 2.7%Associated Press: 0.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chandelis Duster: 0.8%Associated Press: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chandelis Duster: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

315 words analyzed.

Speakers

7speakers64%attributed speech112writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageU.S. military • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageCentral Command • 10 words • 0.0% coverageCentral Command • 34 words • 100.0% coverageIran’s military • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 0.0% coverageU.S. military • 18 words • 0.0% coverageCENTCOM • 17 words • 0.0% coverageCENTCOM • 16 words • 0.0% coverageMojtaba Khamene • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageJordanian state media • 10 words • 0.0% coverageKurdish Iranian opposition group • 24 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Mojtaba Khamene

100%flagged-word coverage
26 attributed words13% of attributed speech89% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Mojtaba Khamene: 100.0%100.0%Quote-first Misdirection+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Mojtaba Khamene: 100.0%100.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.