Speaker summary
50% 20 analyzed articles/videos 652.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Homeland Security results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Politically Right Leaning Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 48.4% saturation with 520 hits . Analysis detected 1,522.168 faulty-reasoning hits from 652.667 analyzed words across 20 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 6.2% and a BS Rank of 5% (25,638 of 26,781 speakers). This Homeland Security is better (less manipulative) than 95.70% of the peer group. Homeland Security
Speaker details
Total words: 652.667
Content count: 20
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
4% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 4.3% percentile 6.2% BS Score20 analyzed videos652.7 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 48.4% 48.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 13.4% 13.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 6.2% 6.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 6.5% 6.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 1.4% 1.4% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Speaker 6.8% 6.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 3.5% 3.5% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Speaker 5.4% 5.4% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 4.9% 4.9% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Speaker 6.1% 6.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 48.4%, sitewide 11.1% Framing Effect: Speaker 13.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 7.6%, sitewide 7.5% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 1.4% Halo Effect: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 5.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 2.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 6.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 2.0% Anecdotal: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 5.2% Recency Bias: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 1.5% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Ad Hominem: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 1.1% Tu Quoque: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 0.2% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 0.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst