Author summary
99% 1 analyzed article/video 1,287 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Joseph Ford Cotto results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Framing Effect , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 22% saturation with 848 hits . Analysis detected 7,733 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,861 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.6% and a BS Rank of 80% (1,261 of 6,195 authors). This Joseph Ford Cotto is worse (more manipulative) than 79.70% of the peer group. Joseph Ford Cotto
Author details
Total words: 3,861
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
80% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 79.7% percentile 4.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 11.7% 11.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 22.0% 22.0% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 14.0% 14.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.7% 9.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 11.4% 11.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 8.0% 8.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 10.5% 10.5% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Author 5.2% 5.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 12.2% 12.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.4% 2.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 11.7%, sitewide 26.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 22.0%, sitewide 8.1% Negativity Bias: Author 9.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 12.2%, sitewide 15.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 14.0%, sitewide 1.4% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 11.4%, sitewide 3.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 8.9%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.5%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.7%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 8.7%, sitewide 7.5% Indoctrination: Author 8.0%, sitewide 0.0% In-Group Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 6.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.7%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Author 5.5%, sitewide 5.2% Burden of Proof: Author 5.2%, sitewide 0.4% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Author 4.5%, sitewide 1.1% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.0% Ad Hominem: Author 4.0%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 2.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst