Speaker summary
⁠81%4 analyzed articles/videos278 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Helena Moreno results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma, Framing Effect, and Self-Serving Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 19.5% saturation with 73.025 hits. Analysis detected 672.153 faulty-reasoning hits from 278 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 9.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠11% (25,320 of 28,364 speakers). This Helena Moreno is better (less manipulative) than 89.30% of the peer group.
Helena Moreno
Speaker details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

11% percentile
025507510010.7% percentile
9.7% BS Score4 analyzed videos278 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 31.0%31.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 19.8%19.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 9.3%9.3%Circular ReasoningSitewide 0.1%Speaker 14.9%14.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 19.5%19.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 6.0%6.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 13.9%13.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 10.9%10.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 4.5%4.5%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Speaker 6.0%6.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Ad Hominem: Speaker 31.0%, sitewide 2.2%Framing Effect: Speaker 9.3%, sitewide 26.9%False Dilemma: Speaker 19.8%, sitewide 1.5%Optimism Bias: Speaker 19.5%, sitewide 6.0%Negativity Bias: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 10.9%, sitewide 15.9%Circular Reasoning: Speaker 14.9%, sitewide 0.1%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 13.9%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 11.1%In-Group Bias: Speaker 10.1%, sitewide 6.9%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 6.7%Genetic Fallacy: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 1.4%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 4.6%Begging the Question: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 3.3%Ad HominemSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos