Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Stephen Smith results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Anecdotal, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 32.2% saturation with 632 hits. Analysis detected 1,514 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,964 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,346 authors). This Stephen Smith is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Stephen Smith
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
0%Stephen Smith (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 1,964
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.4%3.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 32.2%32.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.8%4.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.4%4.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 8.3%8.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 9.5%9.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 2.2%2.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 2.6%2.6%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Author 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Author 32.2%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Author 3.4%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 9.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.4%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Author 8.3%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Red Herring: Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.7%Negativity BiasSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos