Author summary
19%2 analyzed articles/videos1,745 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Joni Hess results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Framing Effect, and Availability Heuristic, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 9.3% saturation with 487 hits. Analysis detected 2,545 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,235 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 17% (5,307 of 6,347 authors). This Joni Hess is better (less manipulative) than 83.60% of the peer group.
Joni Hess
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
17%Joni Hess (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 5,235
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

16% percentile
025507510016.4% percentile
1.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.9%3.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.6%1.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.2%1.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.2%0.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.6%4.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.2%3.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.7%0.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.9%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.6%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Author 9.3%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.2%Loss Aversion: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.5%Recency Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos