Speaker summary
70% 11 analyzed articles/videos 829 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Greg Casar results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Quote-first Misdirection , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 28.3% saturation with 234.964 hits . Analysis detected 2,505.301 faulty-reasoning hits from 829 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 6.7% and a BS Rank of 5% (25,640 of 26,968 speakers). This Greg Casar is better (less manipulative) than 95.10% of the peer group. Greg Casar
Speaker details
Total words: 829
Article count: 11
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
5% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 4.9% percentile 6.7% BS Score11 analyzed videos829 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 28.3% 28.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 12.4% 12.4% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 12.8% 12.8% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 9.4% 9.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 2.8% 2.8% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 10.5% 10.5% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 9.0% 9.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 20.1% 20.1% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Speaker 8.5% 8.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 13.4% 13.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 28.3%, sitewide 15.9% Framing Effect: Speaker 20.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 13.4%, sitewide 19.2% Begging the Question: Speaker 12.8%, sitewide 1.7% Indoctrination: Speaker 12.4%, sitewide 0.0% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 12.0%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Bandwagon: Speaker 10.5%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 9.4%, sitewide 0.0% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 9.0%, sitewide 1.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 2.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 7.9%, sitewide 3.3% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Slippery Slope: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 1.7% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Primacy Effect: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 0.9% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 4.6% Middle Ground: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 0.1% False Dilemma: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 1.5% Burden of Proof: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 0.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst