Speaker summary
49% 30 analyzed articles/videos 717 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gallup results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Recency Bias , and Composition/Division , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 22.6% saturation with 292 hits . Analysis detected 1,203.802 faulty-reasoning hits from 717 analyzed words across 30 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.4% and a BS Rank of 3% (27,500 of 28,364 speakers). This Gallup is better (less manipulative) than 97.00% of the peer group. Gallup
Speaker details
Total words: 717
Article count: 30
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 3.0% percentile 5.4% BS Score30 analyzed videos717 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 2.0% 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 13.3% 13.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 22.6% 22.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 9.7% 9.7% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Speaker 8.0% 8.0% Composition/Division Sitewide 0.2% Speaker 5.4% 5.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Speaker 9.2% 9.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 4.7% 4.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 3.5% 3.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 2.0% 2.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 13.3%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 22.6%, sitewide 11.1% Negativity Bias: Speaker 9.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 9.2%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 8.1% Recency Bias: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 2.7% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 6.9% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 3.3% Composition/Division: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 0.2% Anecdotal: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 0.5% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Middle Ground: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 0.1% Primacy Effect: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst