Author summary
74% 5 analyzed articles/videos 1,222 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Andrew Day results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Politically Right Leaning Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 12.1% saturation with 1,792 hits . Analysis detected 20,418 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,858 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 50% (3,123 of 6,170 authors). This Andrew Day is better (less manipulative) than 50.60% of the peer group. Andrew Day
Author details
Total words: 14,858
Article count: 5
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
49% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 49.4% percentile 2.6% BS Score5 analyzed articles14.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.2% 6.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.0% 7.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.8% 5.8% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 11.4% 11.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.5% 4.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 11.5% 11.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.1% 4.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 12.1% 12.1% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.5% 3.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.8%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 12.1%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 11.5%, sitewide 5.3% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 11.4%, sitewide 1.4% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 9.1%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.1%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 3.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.3%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 3.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.0% False Dilemma: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.5% Begging the Question: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.7% Straw Man: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst