Speaker summary
34% 40 analyzed articles/videos 925 analyzed words
BS Summary: These FDA results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation) , Framing Effect , and Confirmation Bias , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 21.7% saturation with 286.473 hits . Analysis detected 1,852.917 faulty-reasoning hits from 925 analyzed words across 40 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 2% (25,781 of 26,155 speakers). This FDA is better (less manipulative) than 98.60% of the peer group. FDA
Speaker details
Total words: 925
Content count: 40
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.4% percentile 4.0% BS Score40 analyzed videos925 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 9.6% 9.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 3.6% 3.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 1.6% 1.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 11.8% 11.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 21.7% 21.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 1.6% 1.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 1.9% 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 3.8% 3.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 4.4% 4.4% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 3.9% 3.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 9.6%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 21.7%, sitewide 11.1% Negativity Bias: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 15.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 11.8%, sitewide 0.8% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 9.4%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 4.6% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 1.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Begging the Question: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 1.7% Recency Bias: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Burden of Proof: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 0.4% Indoctrination: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Middle Ground: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst