Speaker summary
68% 5 analyzed articles/videos 949 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Eric Trump results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Halo Effect , and Self-Serving Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 61.8% saturation with 526 hits . Analysis detected 2,412.328 faulty-reasoning hits from 949 analyzed words across 5 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 13.3% and a BS Rank of 19% (23,092 of 28,364 speakers). This Eric Trump is better (less manipulative) than 81.40% of the peer group. Eric Trump
Speaker details
Total words: 949
Content count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
19% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 18.6% percentile 13.3% BS Score5 analyzed videos949 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 61.8% 61.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 33.9% 33.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 29.8% 29.8% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 26.0% 26.0% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 14.0% 14.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 20.2% 20.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 14.6% 14.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 1.5% 1.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Speaker 0.8% 0.8% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 4.3% 4.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Framing Effect: Speaker 61.8%, sitewide 26.9% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 33.9%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Speaker 29.8%, sitewide 6.7% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 26.0%, sitewide 3.7% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 20.2%, sitewide 11.1% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 15.5%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 14.6%, sitewide 8.1% Bandwagon: Speaker 14.0%, sitewide 2.2% In-Group Bias: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 6.9% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 4.6% Optimism Bias: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Loss Aversion: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 1.1% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Tu Quoque: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 0.2% Begging the Question: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst