Speaker summary
33% 7 analyzed articles/videos 493.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dave Roberts results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Ambiguity (Equivocation) , and False Dilemma , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 17.4% saturation with 123.815 hits . Analysis detected 524.465 faulty-reasoning hits from 493.667 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 1% (28,146 of 28,364 speakers). This Dave Roberts is better (less manipulative) than 99.20% of the peer group. Dave Roberts
Speaker details
Total words: 493.667
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.8% percentile 3.2% BS Score7 analyzed videos493.7 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 2.2% 2.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 17.4% 17.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 1.4% 1.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 0.6% 0.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 2.4% 2.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 4.0% 4.0% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 2.9% 2.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 19.2% Optimism Bias: Speaker 17.4%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 1.5% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Special Pleading: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst