A solution to the Phillies’ fifth-starter spot? Skip it. But only for now. 23%

By Scott Lauber43%

7/20/2026, 11:03:52 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 26 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Optimism Bias, and Fundamental Attribution Error, with False Dilemma as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 68 hits. Analysis detected 710 faulty-reasoning hits from 690 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 36% and a BS Rank of 23% (17,002 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 77.70% of the article peer group.

Here’s one way to handle not having an appealing choice to fill the fifth-starter spot: Skip it. 
With a day off Thursday in between home series against the Dodgers and Yankees, the Phillies are talking about going with four starters this time through the rotation, interim manager Don Mattingly said Monday. 
But, well, that may present problems, too. 
The Phillies are built to go only as far as their top three starting pitchers carry them. 
It’s imperative, then, for Cristopher Sánchez, Zack Wheeler, and Jesús Luzardo to stay healthy. 
Whenever possible, extra rest between starts can help. 
“In general, I like with those guys giving them their rest,” Mattingly said. 
“It’s not a situation where our depth is at a point where you can lose one of those guys. 
We’re going to need to keep them strong all year. 
So, we’re going to be careful with that.” 
Actually, the Phillies’ rotation depth is perilously thin. 
Although Wheeler opened the season on the injured list while recovering from complicated surgery to relieve a vein that was compressed between his collarbone and ribcage, the Phillies were unable to secure veteran pitchers to stash in triple A. 
Taijuan Walker filled out a season-opening rotation that included rookie Andrew Painter. 
Walker posted a 9.13 ERA in four starts and was released with nearly $18 million left on his contract when Wheeler returned at the end of April. 
Painter, meanwhile, got demoted to triple A with a 7.06 in June. 
The Phillies recalled righty Alan Rangel, who was optioned to triple A on Monday with a 5.40 ERA in three starts and three appearances behind an opener. 
The day off would enable Sánchez and Wheeler to start Saturday and Sunday, respectively, on regular (four days’) rest against the Yankees. 
In that case, the Phillies wouldn’t need a fifth starter until Tuesday night in Miami. 
And because of another day off July 30, they wouldn’t need a fifth starter again before the Aug. 3 trade deadline. 
A back-end starter is on Dave Dombrowski’s shopping list, though it’s likely less of a priority than a late-inning reliever and a right-handed bat. 
“I worry more about health than I worry about who we’re playing,” Mattingly said. 
“In general, I’m more worried about our guys staying strong and feeling good the whole year, the rest of the year than pushing them up for one series or another. 
“We need our guys all the way through.” 
If the Phillies choose to prioritize rest for Sánchez and Wheeler, the fifth-starter spot could come around Saturday against the Yankees. 
They could divide that start between relievers. 
With the promotion Monday of hard-throwing Alex McFarlane, they have nine relievers in the bullpen. 
Ideally, Painter would rejoin the rotation in the second half after improving his fastball and building confidence in the minors. 
He allowed two runs in 10 innings in his first two starts back in triple A before giving up seven runs in only 2⅔ innings in his final start before the All-Star break. 
Wheeler didn’t conceal that he was irked over not being picked by MLB for the National League All-Star team. 
And when the league made a late offer to put him on the roster if he agreed to pitch on one day’s rest, he declined, saying he was “not going be disrespected.” 
Dodgers manager Dave Roberts, who led the NL team, declined to weigh in on the situation. 
“Zack made a personal decision that he thought was best for him,” Roberts said. 
“I think everyone respects it. 
So, I don’t really have a whole lot of color on that one.” 
Rookie right fielder Gabriel Rincones Jr. went viral for putting on sunglasses while catching a fly ball Sunday against the Mets. 
Mattingly’s reaction: “I would think you’d want to have them on the whole time. 
I thought he had the flip-downs on, and then later seeing it, I was like, ‘What in the world?’ 
I’ve never seen that.” ... 
Wheeler (10-1, 2.13 ERA) will face Dodgers All-Star lefty Justin Wrobleski (10-2, 2.69) at 6:40 p.m. 
Tuesday. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 3.6%Scott Lauber: 1.1%Inquirer.com: 2.1%Confirmation Bias3.6%This article: 3.5%Scott Lauber: 1.2%Inquirer.com: 1.0%Anchoring Bias3.5%This article: 3.8%Scott Lauber: 1.9%Inquirer.com: 2.5%Availability Heuristic3.8%This article: 2.5%Scott Lauber: 0.3%Inquirer.com: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic2.5%This article: 0.0%Scott Lauber: 1.4%Inquirer.com: 0.8%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 1.2%Scott Lauber: 0.8%Inquirer.com: 0.9%Overconfidence Bias1.2%This article: 1.0%Scott Lauber: 5.9%Inquirer.com: 5.0%Framing Effect1.0%This article: 3.9%Scott Lauber: 0.5%Inquirer.com: 0.5%Loss Aversion3.9%This article: 1.4%Scott Lauber: 1.1%Inquirer.com: 0.4%Status Quo Bias1.4%This article: 0.0%Scott Lauber: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 9.3%Scott Lauber: 4.3%Inquirer.com: 2.7%Optimism Bias9.3%This article: 6.4%Scott Lauber: 1.2%Inquirer.com: 0.8%Pessimism Bias6.4%This article: 9.7%Scott Lauber: 8.0%Inquirer.com: 5.7%Negativity Bias9.7%This article: 0.0%Scott Lauber: 3.3%Inquirer.com: 1.4%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 7.7%Scott Lauber: 1.6%Inquirer.com: 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error7.7%This article: 0.0%Scott Lauber: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Lauber: 0.6%Inquirer.com: 1.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Lauber: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Lauber: 0.7%Inquirer.com: 4.4%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Lauber: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Lauber: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Lauber: 2.3%Inquirer.com: 1.4%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Lauber: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Lauber: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Lauber: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.6%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Lauber: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Lauber: 0.7%Inquirer.com: 2.3%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 9.9%Scott Lauber: 1.3%Inquirer.com: 1.1%False Dilemma9.9%This article: 0.0%Scott Lauber: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.2%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Lauber: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 7.5%Scott Lauber: 2.5%Inquirer.com: 3.3%Hasty Generalization7.5%This article: 0.0%Scott Lauber: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.7%Scott Lauber: 0.1%Inquirer.com: 0.5%Bandwagon0.7%This article: 2.8%Scott Lauber: 1.3%Inquirer.com: 3.1%Appeal to Emotion2.8%This article: 2.0%Scott Lauber: 0.3%Inquirer.com: 0.7%Begging the Question2.0%This article: 6.1%Scott Lauber: 2.6%Inquirer.com: 1.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)6.1%This article: 0.0%Scott Lauber: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Lauber: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Lauber: 0.1%Inquirer.com: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 2.5%Scott Lauber: 0.3%Inquirer.com: 0.1%Composition/Division2.5%This article: 4.5%Scott Lauber: 1.0%Inquirer.com: 2.1%Anecdotal4.5%This article: 0.0%Scott Lauber: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 1.0%Scott Lauber: 0.3%Inquirer.com: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)1.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Lauber: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Lauber: 0.2%Inquirer.com: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 2.8%Scott Lauber: 0.4%Inquirer.com: 0.0%Personal Incredulity2.8%This article: 0.6%Scott Lauber: 0.1%Inquirer.com: 0.1%Special Pleading0.6%This article: 0.0%Scott Lauber: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 2.8%Scott Lauber: 0.7%Inquirer.com: 1.3%Unattributed Quote2.8%This article: 2.0%Scott Lauber: 0.9%Inquirer.com: 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection2.0%This article: 3.9%Scott Lauber: 2.9%Inquirer.com: 4.4%Biased Writer Voice3.9%This article: 0.0%Scott Lauber: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 1.5%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Lauber: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Lauber: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Lauber: 3.5%Inquirer.com: 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

690 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers36%attributed speech444writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageDon Mattingly • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageDon Mattingly • 13 words • 0.0% coverageDon Mattingly • 19 words • 100.0% coverageDon Mattingly • 10 words • 0.0% coverageDon Mattingly • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageDave Dombrowski • 24 words • 0.0% coverageDon Mattingly • 14 words • 0.0% coverageDon Mattingly • 30 words • 0.0% coverageDon Mattingly • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageDave Roberts • 16 words • 0.0% coverageDave Roberts • 14 words • 0.0% coverageDave Roberts • 5 words • 0.0% coverageDave Roberts • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageDon Mattingly • 14 words • 100.0% coverageDon Mattingly • 19 words • 0.0% coverageDon Mattingly • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Don Mattingly

68%flagged-word coverage
174 attributed words71% of attributed speech69% writer coverage
0%7.5%15.0%Unattributed Quote+10.9 ptsWriter: 0.0%Don Mattingly: 10.9%10.9%Quote-first Misdirection+8.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Don Mattingly: 8.0%8.0%Biased Writer Voice-6.1 ptsWriter: 6.1%Don Mattingly: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.