Kiké Hernández on why he'll miss Dodgers' White House visit - Los Angeles Times 9%

By Maddie Lee0%

7/11/2026, 3:23:15 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 23 faulty reasoning types, including Status Quo Bias, Optimism Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.5% saturation with 64 hits. Analysis detected 575 faulty-reasoning hits from 675 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 25.7% and a BS Rank of 9% (19,361 of 21,180 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 91.40% of the article peer group.

(Gina Ferazzi / Los Angeles Times) 
By Maddie Lee Staff Writer 
July 10, 2026 8:23 PM PT 
Click here to listen to this article 
This is read by an automated voice. 
Please report any issues or inconsistencies here . 
See more from the L.A. 
Times in Google Search. 
Set us as preferred 
p]:text-cms-story-body-color-text" data-subscriber-content> 
Dodgers utility player Kiké Hernández confirmed Friday what he posted as a comment on Instagram: he won’t be going to the White House on July 23, when President Trump will honor the team for its 2025 World Series championship . 
Instead, Hernández (strained left oblique) is scheduled to be on a minor-league rehab assignment. 
“It’s going to be hard to be in two cities at the same time,” Hernández said. 
“If I was active, I probably wouldn’t have gone anyways.” 
“I’d rather take a day off than do team activities,” he said. 
Last year, Hernández expressed his support for immigrants in Los Angeles on social media amid ICE raids authorized by the Trump administration. 
The White House visit will be on a day off in the middle of a nine-game East Coast trip. 
Plaschke: Are the Dodgers tone deaf? 
White House visit is an insult to their fans 
For a franchise built on a diverse, immigrant-heavy fan base, the Dodgers’ decision to visit President Trump at the White House  again  makes no sense. 
“I’m sure a lot of guys are going to participate and be there, and this is an individual choice,” Roberts said. 
“But I do expect a lot of our guys to be there.” 
Scheduling conflicts when the Dodgers played the Nationals in Washington on April 3-5 pushed back the trip. 
“This took a long time to get both sides together, and, honestly, like I’ve always said, my company line, my personal line is I hope that we get this invitation every year,” Dodgers manager Roberts said. 
“Because that’s the goal: to win a championship, to get this invitation to the White House. 
And I’m not a politician, and I’m doing something that teams have done for decades. 
And so that’s where I stand, really. 
I’m a baseball coach. 
That’s what I do.” 
Back in 2019, Roberts suggested that he might not accept an invitation to the White House with Trump in office. 
But he did attend last year when the Dodgers celebrated their 2024 title. 
Roberts said the Dodgers found out earlier this week that the White House visit had been scheduled. 
The visit will take place during an East Coast road trip following next week’s All-Star break and will be the third time the White House has hosted the team this decade. 
“There was a lot of unknown,” Roberts said. 
“It’s an off day, and then how could we work this out logistically?” 
That set off “a lot of phone calls, texts, and communication internally.” 
Hernández’s injury rehab has moved along more quickly than Roberts initially expected. 
He landed on the injury list in late May after playing in just two games following offseason surgery on his left elbow. 
“He looks normal,” Roberts said last weekend. 
“I’m not saying miraculous, but I’m really in disbelief how well he responded, given the injury.” 
Get our Dodgers Dugout newsletter for insights, news and much more. 
By continuing, you agree to our Terms of Service , which include arbitration and a class action waiver. 
You agree that we and our third-party vendors may collect and use your information, including through cookies, pixels and similar technologies, for the purposes set forth in our Privacy Policy such as personalizing your experience and ads. 
Maddie Lee covers the Dodgers for the Los Angeles Times. 
She joined the paper in March 2026 after six years in Chicago, where she was a Cubs beat writer for the Chicago Sun-Times and NBC Sports Chicago. 
Her previous stops include the Oklahoman, the Clarion-Ledger, the Salt Lake Tribune and the Owensboro Messenger-Inquirer. 
More From the Los Angeles Times 
Most Read in Dodgers 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Maddie Lee: 0.9%Daily Pilot: 2.9%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Maddie Lee: 0.3%Daily Pilot: 1.3%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 1.2%Maddie Lee: 0.3%Daily Pilot: 3.5%Availability Heuristic1.2%This article: 4.6%Maddie Lee: 0.9%Daily Pilot: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic4.6%This article: 1.9%Maddie Lee: 2.3%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Hindsight Bias1.9%This article: 1.8%Maddie Lee: 0.2%Daily Pilot: 1.9%Overconfidence Bias1.8%This article: 4.0%Maddie Lee: 3.3%Daily Pilot: 7.5%Framing Effect4.0%This article: 0.0%Maddie Lee: 0.5%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 7.6%Maddie Lee: 1.5%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Status Quo Bias7.6%This article: 0.0%Maddie Lee: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 7.3%Maddie Lee: 3.5%Daily Pilot: 3.6%Optimism Bias7.3%This article: 2.4%Maddie Lee: 0.7%Daily Pilot: 1.4%Pessimism Bias2.4%This article: 9.5%Maddie Lee: 2.4%Daily Pilot: 7.7%Negativity Bias9.5%This article: 0.0%Maddie Lee: 1.9%Daily Pilot: 2.2%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Maddie Lee: 0.1%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Maddie Lee: 0.4%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Maddie Lee: 0.3%Daily Pilot: 1.7%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Maddie Lee: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Maddie Lee: 1.5%Daily Pilot: 5.1%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Maddie Lee: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Maddie Lee: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Maddie Lee: 0.9%Daily Pilot: 1.3%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Maddie Lee: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Maddie Lee: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Maddie Lee: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Maddie Lee: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 7.0%Maddie Lee: 0.8%Daily Pilot: 4.9%Appeal to Authority7.0%This article: 1.9%Maddie Lee: 0.9%Daily Pilot: 1.2%False Dilemma1.9%This article: 0.0%Maddie Lee: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.7%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 2.4%Maddie Lee: 0.2%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Circular Reasoning2.4%This article: 4.0%Maddie Lee: 1.2%Daily Pilot: 4.4%Hasty Generalization4.0%This article: 0.0%Maddie Lee: 0.6%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.6%Maddie Lee: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 1.0%Bandwagon0.6%This article: 1.3%Maddie Lee: 1.1%Daily Pilot: 5.7%Appeal to Emotion1.3%This article: 0.0%Maddie Lee: 0.3%Daily Pilot: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 5.8%Maddie Lee: 1.4%Daily Pilot: 2.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)5.8%This article: 0.0%Maddie Lee: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Maddie Lee: 0.3%Daily Pilot: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 2.2%Maddie Lee: 0.3%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Appeal to Nature2.2%This article: 0.0%Maddie Lee: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Maddie Lee: 0.3%Daily Pilot: 2.8%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Maddie Lee: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 1.5%Maddie Lee: 2.3%Daily Pilot: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)1.5%This article: 0.0%Maddie Lee: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Maddie Lee: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Maddie Lee: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Maddie Lee: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Maddie Lee: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 5.9%Maddie Lee: 0.7%Daily Pilot: 1.3%Unattributed Quote5.9%This article: 2.4%Maddie Lee: 0.3%Daily Pilot: 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection2.4%This article: 1.3%Maddie Lee: 2.1%Daily Pilot: 6.0%Biased Writer Voice1.3%This article: 0.0%Maddie Lee: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 1.5%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Maddie Lee: 0.6%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 3.3%Maddie Lee: 0.3%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias3.3%This article: 5.5%Maddie Lee: 0.9%Daily Pilot: 4.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…5.5%

675 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers45%attributed speech374writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageGina Ferazzi • 6 words • 0.0% coverageMaddie Lee • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageKiké Hernández • 40 words • 100.0% coverageKiké Hernández • 14 words • 0.0% coverageKiké Hernández • 16 words • 100.0% coverageKiké Hernández • 10 words • 0.0% coverageKiké Hernández • 12 words • 0.0% coverageKiké Hernández • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageRoberts • 21 words • 0.0% coverageRoberts • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageRoberts • 36 words • 0.0% coverageRoberts • 16 words • 0.0% coverageRoberts • 15 words • 0.0% coverageRoberts • 7 words • 0.0% coverageRoberts • 4 words • 0.0% coverageRoberts • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageRoberts • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageRoberts • 8 words • 0.0% coverageRoberts • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageRoberts • 7 words • 0.0% coverageRoberts • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Roberts

80%flagged-word coverage
176 attributed words58% of attributed speech59% writer coverage
0%5.0%10.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -9.9 ptsWriter: 9.9%Roberts: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-2.4 ptsWriter: 2.4%Roberts: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.