Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Kayla Bartkowski results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Anecdotal , and Negativity Bias , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 8.7% saturation with 410 hits . Analysis detected 2,831 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,688 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,449 authors). This Kayla Bartkowski is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Kayla Bartkowski
Author details
Total words: 4,688
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.6% 4.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.5% 6.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.1% 4.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.5% 1.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Author 8.8%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 5.7%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Burden of Proof: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.4% False Dilemma: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst