Author summary
ā 0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Bill Shaikin results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Optimism Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.1% saturation with 233 hits . Analysis detected 2,083 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,094 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ā 0% (0 of 6,316 authors). This Bill Shaikin is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Bill Shaikin
Author details
Total words: 2,094
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 11.1% 11.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.3% 2.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.5% 6.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.8% 1.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 10.5% 10.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.1% 2.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.8% 4.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 11.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.2%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.5%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Author 7.6%, sitewide 6.0% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Loss Aversion: Author 5.5%, sitewide 2.5% Anecdotal: Author 3.8%, sitewide 5.2% Recency Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 2.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 4.1%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.9%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.8% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst