Speaker summary
53% 6 analyzed articles/videos 737.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Darline Graham Nordone results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Anecdotal , and Confirmation Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 33.6% saturation with 284.595 hits . Analysis detected 1,154.995 faulty-reasoning hits from 737.333 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 6.4% and a BS Rank of 5% (27,080 of 28,364 speakers). This Darline Graham Nordone is better (less manipulative) than 95.50% of the peer group. Darline Graham Nordone
Speaker details
Total words: 737.333
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
5% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 4.5% percentile 6.4% BS Score6 analyzed videos737.3 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 33.6% 33.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 2.3% 2.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 19.1% 19.1% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Speaker 11.1% 11.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 1.7% 1.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 9.9% 9.9% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 4.8% 4.8% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 5.2% 5.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 2.1% 2.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 33.6%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 19.2% Halo Effect: Speaker 19.1%, sitewide 6.7% Hindsight Bias: Speaker 11.1%, sitewide 1.4% Anecdotal: Speaker 9.9%, sitewide 5.2% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 0.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 7.4%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 6.0% Begging the Question: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 3.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 0.8% Personal Incredulity: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 0.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst