Speaker summary
65% 14 analyzed articles/videos 772.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dario Amodei results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Negativity Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 31.2% saturation with 279.497 hits . Analysis detected 3,279.108 faulty-reasoning hits from 772.333 analyzed words across 14 articles, generating a BS Score of 10.4% and a BS Rank of 13% (24,853 of 28,364 speakers). This Dario Amodei is better (less manipulative) than 87.60% of the peer group. Dario Amodei
Speaker details
Total words: 772.333
Article count: 14
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
12% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 12.4% percentile 10.4% BS Score14 analyzed videos772.3 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Speaker 37.5% 37.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 6.9% 6.9% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 20.6% 20.6% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 19.8% 19.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 31.2% 31.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 21.3% 21.3% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 15.6% 15.6% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 11.5% 11.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 16.5% 16.5% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 11.3% 11.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 37.5%, sitewide 3.1% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 31.2%, sitewide 15.9% Framing Effect: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 26.9% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 21.3%, sitewide 7.5% Begging the Question: Speaker 20.6%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Speaker 19.8%, sitewide 1.5% Negativity Bias: Speaker 17.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 18.8%, sitewide 11.1% In-Group Bias: Speaker 16.5%, sitewide 6.9% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 15.6%, sitewide 3.7% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 11.7%, sitewide 8.1% Slippery Slope: Speaker 11.5%, sitewide 1.7% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 11.3%, sitewide 1.9% Ad Hominem: Speaker 10.2%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 10.0%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 9.8%, sitewide 0.8% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Speaker 8.2%, sitewide 6.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 0.0% Anecdotal: Speaker 7.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 4.6% Halo Effect: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 4.0% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 5.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst
SFGate 80% 7/22/2026, 2:01:59 AM