Speaker summary
59% 5 analyzed articles/videos 301.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Daniel Mendelsohn results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including Horn Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Ad Hominem , with Representativeness Heuristic as the most egregious example at 21.4% saturation with 99 hits . Analysis detected 558.53 faulty-reasoning hits from 301.333 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 11% and a BS Rank of 14% (24,521 of 28,364 speakers). This Daniel Mendelsohn is better (less manipulative) than 86.50% of the peer group. Daniel Mendelsohn
Speaker details
Total words: 301.333
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
14% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 13.5% percentile 11.0% BS Score5 analyzed videos301.3 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 21.4% 21.4% Horn Effect Sitewide 1.0% Speaker 19.1% 19.1% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 13.5% 13.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 17.6% 17.6% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 7.7% 7.7% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 8.4% 8.4% Composition/Division Sitewide 0.2% Speaker 6.1% 6.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 12.4% 12.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Speaker 1.7% 1.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 11.8% 11.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 5% 5% 10% 10% 15% 15% 20% 20% 25% 25% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 21.4%, sitewide 1.9% Horn Effect: Speaker 19.1%, sitewide 1.0% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 17.6%, sitewide 8.1% Ad Hominem: Speaker 13.5%, sitewide 2.2% In-Group Bias: Speaker 12.4%, sitewide 6.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 11.8%, sitewide 11.1% False Dilemma: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 1.5% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 7.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 0.0% Composition/Division: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 0.2% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 4.6% Representativeness Heuristic Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst