Author summary
â 0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Daniel Mendelsohn results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Availability Heuristic , and Halo Effect , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 24.6% saturation with 285 hits . Analysis detected 1,793 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,160 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of â 0% (0 of 6,606 authors). This Daniel Mendelsohn is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Daniel Mendelsohn
Author details
Total words: 1,160
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.2% 7.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 24.6% 24.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 18.0% 18.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.1% 5.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 9.0% 9.0% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Author 10.2% 10.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 7.2% 7.2% Primacy Effect Sitewide 0.9% Author 7.2% 7.2% Representativeness Heuris⌠Sitewide 1.9% Author 7.2% 7.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 11.3% 11.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.2%, sitewide 26.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 24.6%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 18.0%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.1%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 13.0%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Author 11.3%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.9%, sitewide 11.1% Recency Bias: Author 10.2%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Author 9.0%, sitewide 0.0% Confirmation Bias: Author 7.9%, sitewide 7.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 7.2%, sitewide 0.8% Primacy Effect: Author 7.2%, sitewide 0.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 7.2%, sitewide 1.9% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 3.7% Begging the Question: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.5%, sitewide 3.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 0.2%, sitewide 0.5% Circular Reasoning: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst