Speaker summary
41%9 analyzed articles/videos120.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These City officials results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Anchoring Bias, and Loss Aversion, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 21.4% saturation with 40 hits. Analysis detected 113 faulty-reasoning hits from 120.667 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 16.8% and a BS Rank of 27% (25,742 of 35,283 speakers). This City officials is better (less manipulative) than 73.00% of the peer group.
City officials
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
0%The Brookings Institution1%
0%Gen Jack Keane1%
0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
0%Mike Muse1%
27%City officials (selected)17%
100%314 Action Fund100%
100%21 Grams100%
100%2035 Initiative100%
100%1X representative100%
100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

27% percentile
025507510027.0% percentile
16.8% BS Score9 analyzed videos120.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 21.8%21.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 21.8%21.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 10.7%10.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 21.4%21.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 8.0%8.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 10.7%, sitewide 26.9%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 21.8%, sitewide 4.0%Loss Aversion: Speaker 21.8%, sitewide 2.5%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 21.4%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 5.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate