Author summary
17% 3 analyzed articles/videos 5,039 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Roberto Scalese results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 13.4% saturation with 2,069 hits . Analysis detected 6,104 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,423 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of 3% (6,179 of 6,357 authors). This Roberto Scalese is better (less manipulative) than 97.20% of the peer group. Roberto Scalese
Author details
Total words: 15,423
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 2.8% percentile 1.1% BS Score3 analyzed articles15.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.9% 1.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.7% 3.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.0% 1.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 13.4% 13.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.4% 0.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 13.4%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst