Author summary
55% 14 analyzed articles/videos 8,352 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Karen Yi results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Optimism Bias , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.7% saturation with 3,780 hits . Analysis detected 34,641 faulty-reasoning hits from 43,330 analyzed words across 14 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 17% (5,119 of 6,137 authors). This Karen Yi is better (less manipulative) than 83.40% of the peer group. Karen Yi
Author details
Total words: 43,330
Article count: 14
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
17% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 16.6% percentile 1.6% BS Score14 analyzed articles43.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.8% 4.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.7% 8.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.6% 7.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.5% 4.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.2% 2.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Loss Aversion: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst