Speaker summary
⁠54%7 analyzed articles/videos433 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Christopher Luxon results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Hasty Generalization, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 50.1% saturation with 236.338 hits. Analysis detected 537.113 faulty-reasoning hits from 433 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 12.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠17% (23,683 of 28,364 speakers). This Christopher Luxon is better (less manipulative) than 83.50% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

17% percentile
025507510016.5% percentile
12.3% BS Score7 analyzed videos433 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 50.1%50.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 21.5%21.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 10.8%10.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 4.7%4.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 3.6%3.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 2.9%2.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 4.1%4.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 8.3%8.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 4.7%4.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Halo Effect: Speaker 50.1%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 21.5%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 10.8%, sitewide 3.3%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 0.8%Halo EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos