Speaker summary
36% 9 analyzed articles/videos 976 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Christopher Cooper results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 11.7% saturation with 204 hits . Analysis detected 1,604.788 faulty-reasoning hits from 976 analyzed words across 9 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 4.8% and a BS Rank of 3% (28,320 of 28,995 speakers). This Christopher Cooper is better (less manipulative) than 97.70% of the peer group. Christopher Cooper
Speaker details
Total words: 976
Content count: 9
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
2% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 2.3% percentile 4.8% BS Score9 analyzed videos976 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 3.8% 3.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 4.9% 4.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 11.7% 11.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 9.7% 9.7% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 6.9% 6.9% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 7.6% 7.6% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Speaker 5.5% 5.5% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 4.3% 4.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Speaker 1.8% 1.8% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 3.2% 3.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 9.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 15.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 11.7%, sitewide 0.8% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 11.6%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 9.4%, sitewide 7.5% Ad Hominem: Speaker 7.6%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 0.0% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 5.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 2.7% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 4.6% Begging the Question: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 1.7% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 1.1% Recency Bias: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 2.7% Red Herring: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 0.7% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Circular Reasoning: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 0.1% Genetic Fallacy: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 1.4% False Dilemma: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 1.5% Primacy Effect: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst