Author summary
64% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,082 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Anastasia Tsioulcas results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Halo Effect , and Optimism Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 14.9% saturation with 803 hits . Analysis detected 6,687 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,406 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 72% (1,858 of 6,628 authors). This Anastasia Tsioulcas is worse (more manipulative) than 72.00% of the peer group. Anastasia Tsioulcas
Author details
Total words: 5,406
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
72% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 72.0% percentile 3.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 11.9% 11.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.6% 4.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 11.7% 11.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 11.8% 11.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.9% 2.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 10.7% 10.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 7.7% 7.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.5% 1.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 11.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 14.8%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Author 11.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 11.7%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.7%, sitewide 11.1% In-Group Bias: Author 10.7%, sitewide 6.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.7%, sitewide 0.8% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 2.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst