Publication summary
8% 15 analyzed articles/videos 7,798 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ideastream Public Media results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Framing Effect , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 387 hits . Analysis detected 1,928 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,672 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 382 publications). This Ideastream Public Media is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 3,672
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 1.9% 1.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 10.5% 10.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 2.8% 2.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 1.7% 1.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 5.4% 5.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 0.5% 0.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 2.6% 2.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Publication 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 3.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 10.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 5.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 1.4% Burden of Proof: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 0.4% Quote-first Misdirection: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% Primacy Effect: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 0.9% Unattributed Quote: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 1.1% Circular Reasoning: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst