Speaker summary
64% 16 analyzed articles/videos 876.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chris Murphy results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Appeal to Emotion , and Ad Hominem , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.7% saturation with 185 hits . Analysis detected 1,844.58 faulty-reasoning hits from 876.333 analyzed words across 16 articles, generating a BS Score of 5% and a BS Rank of 3% (27,635 of 28,364 speakers). This Chris Murphy is better (less manipulative) than 97.40% of the peer group. Chris Murphy
Speaker details
Total words: 876.333
Article count: 16
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 2.6% percentile 5.0% BS Score16 analyzed videos876.3 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 4.5% 4.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 13.7% 13.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 17.3% 17.3% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 9.1% 9.1% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 9.2% 9.2% Circular Reasoning Sitewide 0.1% Speaker 7.0% 7.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 5.2% 5.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 5.0% 5.0% Red Herring Sitewide 0.7% Speaker 4.9% 4.9% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Speaker 4.5% 4.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 13.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 17.3%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 17.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 11.1% Ad Hominem: Speaker 9.2%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Speaker 9.1%, sitewide 1.5% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 7.5% Circular Reasoning: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 0.1% In-Group Bias: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Indoctrination: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 0.0% Red Herring: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 0.7% Hindsight Bias: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 1.4% Burden of Proof: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 0.4% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 2.0% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 4.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst