Speaker summary
⁠34%2 analyzed articles/videos72 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chris Deacon results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Appeal to Emotion, and Unattributed Quote, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 41.2% saturation with 49 hits. Analysis detected 172 faulty-reasoning hits from 72 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 24.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠39% (17,360 of 28,364 speakers). This Chris Deacon is better (less manipulative) than 61.20% of the peer group.
Chris Deacon
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 72
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

39% percentile
025507510038.8% percentile
24.1% BS Score2 analyzed videos72 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 41.2%41.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 21.0%21.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 21.0%21.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 20.2%20.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 20.2%20.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 21.0%21.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Speaker 41.2%, sitewide 19.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 21.0%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 21.0%, sitewide 15.9%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 21.0%, sitewide 1.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 20.2%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 20.2%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos