STAT44%

5 takeaways from STAT’s series on the soaring cost of health insurance 69%

By Bob Herman70%

7/7/2026, 1:30:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 19 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 47.7% saturation with 220 hits. Analysis detected 1,126 faulty-reasoning hits from 461 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 62.1% and a BS Rank of 69% (6,875 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 68.60% of the article peer group.

More than 150 million Americans get their health insurance from a job, making it the primary way people in the U.S. get coverage. 
STAT is examining this crucial source of insurance to understand how and why it is becoming unaffordable for workers and their families across the country. 
Health benefits are fading away at small companies 
Nearly all large companies offer health insurance. 
But fewer than 60% of smaller firms, with 200 or fewer workers, now offer insurance, an all-time low. 
The costs of health insurance are pushing small businesses  beloved by politicians and the bedrocks of entire communities  to a financial cliff. 
Watering down their insurance plans, or deciding not to offer insurance at all, makes it more difficult for these businesses to retain employees. 
Offering insurance comes with huge out-of-pocket costs and unwelcome surprises 
Even though most small businesses still offer health insurance, they are burdened most by the costs. 
Deductibles are more than 50% higher at small firms compared with larger companies. 
Small businesses also could face unexpected surcharges from insurance companies if the number of workers who enroll increases too much. 
Virtual Event **July 22 | 1 p.m. 
ET** 
Go behind the reporting in this series at Office Hours with STAT’s Bob Herman. 
Register now. 
Premiums are rising much faster than inflation 
Federal data show that employers and workers collectively contributed $132.5 billion toward health insurance premiums in 1987. 
By 2024, that rose to more than $1.4 trillion, vastly outpacing inflation. 
If premiums tracked inflation perfectly over that time period, employers and workers would have contributed $365 billion. 
Even when adjusting for average annual payrolls, job-based health coverage has feasted relentlessly on workers’ earnings. 
Entrepreneurs and mom-and-pop shops increasingly rely on ACA plans 
Half of all people who buy coverage on the Affordable Care Act’s marketplaces work for small businesses or are self-employed, compared with roughly 28% in 2022. 
This coverage has become a lot more expensive after Congress did not renew enhanced subsidies that lowered people’s costs. 
The whistleblower who has become one of America’s most influential health care critics 
Chris Deacon used to oversee New Jersey’s health plan for state workers. 
She discovered the state’s health insurance company was not living up to its promises and was deliberately overpaying for care, so she blew the whistle. 
But New Jersey specifically cut out Deacon from one of the largest settlements involving employer health insurance. 
She’s ascended to become one of the country’s most outspoken critics of the health care system, explaining how employers routinely get taken advantage of. 
Read The series **Out of Pocket, Out of Reach** 
How America’s employer-based health care system continues to crumble in slow motion 
Share your story 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Bob Herman: 0.7%STAT: 3.4%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 3.7%Bob Herman: 1.3%STAT: 1.3%Anchoring Bias3.7%This article: 0.0%Bob Herman: 2.8%STAT: 3.9%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 5.0%Bob Herman: 1.1%STAT: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic5.0%This article: 0.0%Bob Herman: 0.0%STAT: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bob Herman: 2.8%STAT: 1.3%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 27.3%Bob Herman: 14.3%STAT: 8.2%Framing Effect27.3%This article: 2.2%Bob Herman: 0.8%STAT: 0.7%Loss Aversion2.2%This article: 0.0%Bob Herman: 0.0%STAT: 0.9%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bob Herman: 0.0%STAT: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Bob Herman: 0.8%STAT: 3.3%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 15.8%Bob Herman: 5.3%STAT: 1.8%Pessimism Bias15.8%This article: 47.7%Bob Herman: 22.8%STAT: 8.5%Negativity Bias47.7%This article: 0.0%Bob Herman: 0.0%STAT: 1.1%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bob Herman: 0.6%STAT: 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Bob Herman: 0.0%STAT: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bob Herman: 0.0%STAT: 0.4%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bob Herman: 0.0%STAT: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 8.0%Bob Herman: 2.5%STAT: 1.3%Halo Effect8.0%This article: 0.0%Bob Herman: 0.0%STAT: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Bob Herman: 0.0%STAT: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 9.5%Bob Herman: 2.6%STAT: 1.6%Recency Bias9.5%This article: 0.0%Bob Herman: 0.6%STAT: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Bob Herman: 0.0%STAT: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bob Herman: 0.0%STAT: 0.4%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Bob Herman: 0.0%STAT: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 3.7%Bob Herman: 2.1%STAT: 4.7%Appeal to Authority3.7%This article: 0.0%Bob Herman: 0.6%STAT: 1.5%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 2.6%Bob Herman: 2.0%STAT: 1.2%Slippery Slope2.6%This article: 0.0%Bob Herman: 0.0%STAT: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 8.7%Bob Herman: 9.0%STAT: 4.6%Hasty Generalization8.7%This article: 0.0%Bob Herman: 0.7%STAT: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Bob Herman: 0.0%STAT: 0.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 18.9%Bob Herman: 10.1%STAT: 3.6%Appeal to Emotion18.9%This article: 0.0%Bob Herman: 0.6%STAT: 0.9%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 9.1%Bob Herman: 3.0%STAT: 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)9.1%This article: 0.0%Bob Herman: 0.0%STAT: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Bob Herman: 0.4%STAT: 0.7%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Bob Herman: 0.0%STAT: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Bob Herman: 0.6%STAT: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 3.7%Bob Herman: 1.9%STAT: 3.3%Anecdotal3.7%This article: 0.0%Bob Herman: 0.0%STAT: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 20.8%Bob Herman: 3.9%STAT: 2.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)20.8%This article: 0.0%Bob Herman: 0.0%STAT: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Bob Herman: 0.0%STAT: 0.3%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Bob Herman: 0.0%STAT: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Bob Herman: 0.0%STAT: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Bob Herman: 0.0%STAT: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 9.8%Bob Herman: 2.8%STAT: 1.5%Unattributed Quote9.8%This article: 0.0%Bob Herman: 0.0%STAT: 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 35.8%Bob Herman: 16.0%STAT: 6.0%Biased Writer Voice35.8%This article: 0.0%Bob Herman: 1.0%STAT: 2.1%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Bob Herman: 0.0%STAT: 0.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 4.1%Bob Herman: 0.6%STAT: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias4.1%This article: 7.8%Bob Herman: 6.1%STAT: 3.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…7.8%

461 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker13%attributed speech400writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageChris Deacon • 12 words • 0.0% coverageChris Deacon • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageChris Deacon • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Chris Deacon

80%flagged-word coverage
61 attributed words100% of attributed speech97% writer coverage
0%22.5%45.0%Biased Writer Voice-41.3 ptsWriter: 41.3%Chris Deacon: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote+36.0 ptsWriter: 5.0%Chris Deacon: 41.0%41.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -9.0 ptsWriter: 9.0%Chris Deacon: 0.0%0.0%Politically Right Leaning -4.8 ptsWriter: 4.8%Chris Deacon: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.