Speaker summary
78% 9 analyzed articles/videos 768 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brendan Boyle results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Ad Hominem , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 48.5% saturation with 372.802 hits . Analysis detected 2,465.645 faulty-reasoning hits from 768 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 12.6% and a BS Rank of 18% (23,346 of 28,155 speakers). This Brendan Boyle is better (less manipulative) than 82.90% of the peer group. Brendan Boyle
Speaker details
Total words: 768
Article count: 9
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
17% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 17.1% percentile 12.6% BS Score9 analyzed videos768 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 48.5% 48.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 39.4% 39.4% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 26.5% 26.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 10.2% 10.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 33.5% 33.5% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 14.5% 14.5% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Speaker 13.8% 13.8% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 16.2% 16.2% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Speaker 12.9% 12.9% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 7.8% 7.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 48.5%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 39.4%, sitewide 8.1% Negativity Bias: Speaker 33.5%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Speaker 10.2%, sitewide 26.9% Ad Hominem: Speaker 26.5%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 16.2%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Speaker 14.5%, sitewide 1.5% Straw Man: Speaker 13.8%, sitewide 0.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 12.9%, sitewide 2.0% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 0.0% In-Group Bias: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 6.9% Slippery Slope: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 1.7% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Hindsight Bias: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 1.4% Begging the Question: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 1.7% Tu Quoque: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 0.2% Indoctrination: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst