Publication summary
42% 2 analyzed articles/videos 800 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Santa Fe New Mexican results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 670 hits . Analysis detected 5,212 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,443 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 62% (157 of 410 publications). This Santa Fe New Mexican is worse (more manipulative) than 61.90% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 6,443
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
62% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 61.9% percentile 2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 10.4% 10.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 8.8% 8.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 7.3% 7.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 3.2% 3.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 2.3% 2.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 0.8% 0.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 0.9% 0.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 2.1% 2.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 4.6% 4.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Publication 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 10.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 8.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 7.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 4.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 5.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 6.0%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Publication 3.5%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 2.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst