Speaker summary
67% 7 analyzed articles/videos 243 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bill Lee results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Begging the Question , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 22.5% saturation with 96 hits . Analysis detected 884.864 faulty-reasoning hits from 243 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 11.7% and a BS Rank of 15% (23,623 of 27,792 speakers). This Bill Lee is better (less manipulative) than 85.00% of the peer group. Bill Lee
Speaker details
Total words: 243
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
15% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 15.0% percentile 11.7% BS Score7 analyzed videos243 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 33.6% 33.6% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 23.4% 23.4% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 22.5% 22.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 20.6% 20.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 7.7% 7.7% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Speaker 13.6% 13.6% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 12.2% 12.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 17.1% 17.1% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Speaker 11.2% 11.2% Appeal to Nature Sitewide 0.2% Speaker 7.5% 7.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 33.6%, sitewide 7.5% Framing Effect: Speaker 17.1%, sitewide 26.9% Begging the Question: Speaker 23.4%, sitewide 1.7% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 22.5%, sitewide 3.7% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 20.6%, sitewide 4.6% Negativity Bias: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 19.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 13.6%, sitewide 3.3% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 12.2%, sitewide 2.2% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 11.2%, sitewide 8.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 11.2%, sitewide 2.0% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 11.0%, sitewide 5.3% Ad Hominem: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 2.2% In-Group Bias: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 6.9% Straw Man: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 0.9% Appeal to Nature: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 0.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 2.7% Burden of Proof: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 0.4% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst