WPLN News12%

Complaint accuses doctor involved in failed Tennessee execution of violating ethics 57%

By Tony Gonzalez45%

7/19/2026, 9:15:01 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 17 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Unattributed Quote, and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 35.3% saturation with 154 hits. Analysis detected 840 faulty-reasoning hits from 436 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 54% and a BS Rank of 57% (9,506 of 21,886 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 56.60% of the article peer group.

The sister of a Tennessee death row inmate whose execution was halted because of problems inserting an IV has filed a complaint against the doctor who was involved. 
The complaint filed Wednesday with the Tennessee Department of Health by Tonya Hervey says Tony Carruthers suffered excruciating pain during the May 21 attempt to administer a lethal injection and the family believes he now has partial paralysis that they attribute to a stroke. 
It does not specifically say how or when they believe the stroke occurred, and Hervey declined an interview request. 
More: After failed execution, Gov. 
Lee says no moratorium, no protocol changes for lethal injection 
During the attempted execution, the IV team established a primary line right away but then worked for more than an hour trying to insert a backup line. 
Maria DeLiberato, an American Civil Liberties Union attorney representing Carruthers, witnessed the attempts and said the team tried to insert an IV in Carruthers’ arm, hand and foot before Dr. 
Mark Fowler attempted to insert a central line. 
In the end Gov. 
Bill Lee called off the execution and gave Carruthers a one-year reprieve. 
The complaint accuses Fowler of violating medical ethics by participating in an execution; by injecting Carruthers with the anesthetic lidocaine without first establishing that he was not allergic to it; and by continuing the search for a vein despite his “visible agony and distress.” 
The complaint also says he was unqualified to place a central line because he had not done so in over a decade. 
Fowler declined to comment on the complaint when reached by telephone. 
Dr. 
Ervin Yen, a retired cardiac anesthesiologist who has witnessed many executions in Oklahoma and was not involved in the Carruthers case, said the fact that Fowler had not placed a central line in years is not necessarily disqualifying. 
He also said it is very unlikely that the attempts to place an IV could have resulted in a stroke. 
The Tennessee Department of Correction declined to comment on the allegations. 
The Health Department said information on all complaints and investigations is confidential until formal charges are filed, including whether an investigation exists. 
Carruthers, 58, was found guilty of the 1994 kidnapping and murder of Marcellos Anderson; Anderson’s mother, Delois Anderson; and Frederick Tucker. 
Authorities said Marcellos Anderson was a drug dealer and Carruthers was trying to take over the illegal trade in their Memphis neighborhood. 
Carruthers has maintained his innocence. 
He was forced to represent himself at trial after repeatedly complaining about court-appointed attorneys and threatening to harm several of them. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Tony Gonzalez: 2.5%WPLN: 2.3%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tony Gonzalez: 0.6%WPLN: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 6.9%Tony Gonzalez: 4.1%WPLN: 3.8%Availability Heuristic6.9%This article: 5.0%Tony Gonzalez: 0.7%WPLN: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic5.0%This article: 0.0%Tony Gonzalez: 0.0%WPLN: 0.3%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 4.6%Tony Gonzalez: 0.7%WPLN: 0.8%Overconfidence Bias4.6%This article: 13.8%Tony Gonzalez: 3.4%WPLN: 4.0%Framing Effect13.8%This article: 0.0%Tony Gonzalez: 0.1%WPLN: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 7.3%Tony Gonzalez: 0.9%WPLN: 0.7%Status Quo Bias7.3%This article: 0.0%Tony Gonzalez: 0.0%WPLN: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Tony Gonzalez: 2.7%WPLN: 2.8%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tony Gonzalez: 0.8%WPLN: 1.0%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 35.3%Tony Gonzalez: 8.6%WPLN: 7.4%Negativity Bias35.3%This article: 1.1%Tony Gonzalez: 0.9%WPLN: 1.0%Self-Serving Bias1.1%This article: 2.5%Tony Gonzalez: 0.2%WPLN: 0.3%Fundamental Attribution Error2.5%This article: 0.0%Tony Gonzalez: 0.1%WPLN: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tony Gonzalez: 1.2%WPLN: 0.9%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tony Gonzalez: 0.0%WPLN: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tony Gonzalez: 1.7%WPLN: 2.4%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Tony Gonzalez: 0.2%WPLN: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Tony Gonzalez: 0.0%WPLN: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Tony Gonzalez: 2.7%WPLN: 1.6%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tony Gonzalez: 0.1%WPLN: 0.2%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Tony Gonzalez: 0.0%WPLN: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tony Gonzalez: 0.3%WPLN: 0.3%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Tony Gonzalez: 0.0%WPLN: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 13.3%Tony Gonzalez: 4.4%WPLN: 3.2%Appeal to Authority13.3%This article: 0.0%Tony Gonzalez: 0.9%WPLN: 1.0%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Tony Gonzalez: 0.6%WPLN: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Tony Gonzalez: 0.1%WPLN: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 5.0%Tony Gonzalez: 4.0%WPLN: 3.9%Hasty Generalization5.0%This article: 0.0%Tony Gonzalez: 0.2%WPLN: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Tony Gonzalez: 0.4%WPLN: 0.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 20.2%Tony Gonzalez: 4.7%WPLN: 4.7%Appeal to Emotion20.2%This article: 0.0%Tony Gonzalez: 0.4%WPLN: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Tony Gonzalez: 3.4%WPLN: 3.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Tony Gonzalez: 0.0%WPLN: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 10.1%Tony Gonzalez: 1.4%WPLN: 0.8%Burden of Proof10.1%This article: 0.0%Tony Gonzalez: 0.0%WPLN: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Tony Gonzalez: 0.0%WPLN: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 15.1%Tony Gonzalez: 3.0%WPLN: 2.9%Anecdotal15.1%This article: 0.0%Tony Gonzalez: 0.0%WPLN: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 11.9%Tony Gonzalez: 1.6%WPLN: 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)11.9%This article: 0.0%Tony Gonzalez: 0.0%WPLN: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Tony Gonzalez: 0.1%WPLN: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Tony Gonzalez: 0.0%WPLN: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Tony Gonzalez: 0.1%WPLN: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Tony Gonzalez: 0.3%WPLN: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 20.2%Tony Gonzalez: 1.7%WPLN: 1.5%Unattributed Quote20.2%This article: 6.9%Tony Gonzalez: 0.8%WPLN: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection6.9%This article: 13.3%Tony Gonzalez: 1.7%WPLN: 1.9%Biased Writer Voice13.3%This article: 0.0%Tony Gonzalez: 1.7%WPLN: 0.9%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Tony Gonzalez: 0.0%WPLN: 0.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tony Gonzalez: 0.0%WPLN: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tony Gonzalez: 0.6%WPLN: 1.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

436 words analyzed.

Speakers

6speakers33%attributed speech294writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 44 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageBill Lee • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageMaria DeLiberato • 30 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 44 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageMark Fowler • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageErvin Yen • 38 words • 0.0% coverageErvin Yen • 20 words • 0.0% coverageTennessee Department of Correction • 11 words • 0.0% coverageTennessee Department of Health • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Maria DeLiberato

100%flagged-word coverage
30 attributed words21% of attributed speech79% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Quote-first Misdirection+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Maria DeLiberato: 100.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote-29.9 ptsWriter: 29.9%Maria DeLiberato: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-19.7 ptsWriter: 19.7%Maria DeLiberato: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.