Topic summary
17% 7 analyzed articles/videos 3,190 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Capital Punishment results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 14.5% saturation with 3,415 hits . Analysis detected 12,846 faulty-reasoning hits from 23,556 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 4% (15,684 of 16,330 topics). This Capital Punishment is better (less manipulative) than 96.00% of the peer group. Capital Punishment
Topic details
Total words: 23,556
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
4% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 4.0% percentile 1.3% BS Score7 analyzed articles23.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.6% 7.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 7.2% 7.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.9% 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.1% 0.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 14.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst