Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Pamela Colloff results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Halo Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 24% saturation with 2,455 hits. Analysis detected 4,513 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,230 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,316 authors). This Pamela Colloff is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Pamela Colloff
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
0%Pamela Colloff (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 10,230
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles10.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 10.3%10.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.4%1.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 24.0%24.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 0.9%0.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.2%0.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.6%0.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 3.0%3.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 0.2%0.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.8%0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 10.3%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Author 24.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 0.9%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.0%Begging the Question: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.0%Straw Man: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.9%Indoctrination: Author 0.2%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos