Topic summary
⁠40%4 analyzed articles/videos4,767 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Legal Ethics results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.8% saturation with 1,886 hits. Analysis detected 11,887 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,006 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠18% (13,738 of 16,562 topics). This Legal Ethics is better (less manipulative) than 82.90% of the peer group.
Legal Ethics
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 16,006
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

17% percentile
025507510017.1% percentile
1.8% BS Score4 analyzed articles16K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.6%6.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.0%5.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.8%11.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.1%2.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.6%4.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Recency Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos