Author summary
0% 5 analyzed articles/videos 5,952 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jaclyn Diaz results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Availability Heuristic , with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 13.4% saturation with 2,698 hits . Analysis detected 24,899 faulty-reasoning hits from 20,174 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 46% (3,637 of 6,628 authors). This Jaclyn Diaz is better (less manipulative) than 54.90% of the peer group. Jaclyn Diaz
Author details
Total words: 20,174
Article count: 5
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
45% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 45.1% percentile 2.4% BS Score5 analyzed articles20.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 12.6% 12.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.2% 9.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 13.4% 13.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 11.0% 11.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.2% 1.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.0% 2.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.5% 0.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 3.1% 3.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 12.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.0%, sitewide 15.9% Anecdotal: Author 13.4%, sitewide 5.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 10.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Status Quo Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Author 4.2%, sitewide 1.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst