Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Earle J. Fisher results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 30.1% saturation with 1,019 hits. Analysis detected 6,144 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,390 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,205 authors). This Earle J. Fisher is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Earle J. Fisher
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
0%Earle J. Fisher (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 3,390
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.6%2.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 7.6%7.6%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Author 7.6%7.6%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 7.3%7.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 13.6%13.6%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Author 7.1%7.1%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 7.1%7.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 13.2%13.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 1.0%1.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 30.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 13.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 18.5%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Author 13.2%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.6%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 9.4%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Author 8.8%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.1%, sitewide 5.3%Slippery Slope: Author 7.6%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Author 7.6%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Author 7.3%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Author 7.1%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 7.1%, sitewide 2.0%In-Group Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Author 6.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos