Speaker summary
49% 32 analyzed articles/videos 2,314.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bill Cassidy results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias , Pessimism Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 11.5% saturation with 265.875 hits . Analysis detected 2,971.188 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,314.667 analyzed words across 32 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 1% (25,657 of 25,753 speakers). This Bill Cassidy is better (less manipulative) than 99.60% of the peer group. Bill Cassidy
Speaker details
Total words: 2,314.667
Article count: 32
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.4% percentile 2.5% BS Score32 analyzed videos2.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 4.1% 4.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 5.7% 5.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 3.3% 3.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 2.1% 2.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 0.7% 0.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Speaker 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 11.5% 11.5% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 4.4% 4.4% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 7.8% 7.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 11.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 8.1% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 3.7% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Ad Hominem: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 1.9% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 4.6% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 1.5% Begging the Question: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Slippery Slope: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst