Speaker summary
58% 7 analyzed articles/videos 538 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Andy Kim results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 21.4% saturation with 115.262 hits . Analysis detected 1,039.106 faulty-reasoning hits from 538 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 7.3% and a BS Rank of 7% (26,613 of 28,364 speakers). This Andy Kim is better (less manipulative) than 93.80% of the peer group. Andy Kim
Speaker details
Total words: 538
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
6% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 6.2% percentile 7.3% BS Score7 analyzed videos538 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 12.6% 12.6% Red Herring Sitewide 0.7% Speaker 13.8% 13.8% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 9.9% 9.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 13.0% 13.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 1.8% 1.8% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 7.6% 7.6% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 6.3% 6.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 14.3% 14.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 21.4% 21.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 1.5% 1.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 12.6%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 21.4%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 17.6%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 14.3%, sitewide 8.1% Red Herring: Speaker 13.8%, sitewide 0.7% Anecdotal: Speaker 13.0%, sitewide 5.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 9.9%, sitewide 0.0% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Speaker 7.9%, sitewide 6.9% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 7.6%, sitewide 1.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 7.5% Indoctrination: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Begging the Question: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 1.7% Slippery Slope: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 1.7% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 2.2% Burden of Proof: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 0.4% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst