Trump expected to make election conspiracies focus of national address 62%

By The Associated Press63%

7/16/2026, 4:48:52 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 31 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Framing Effect, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 26.1% saturation with 242 hits. Analysis detected 1,661 faulty-reasoning hits from 928 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 57.3% and a BS Rank of 62% (8,390 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 61.70% of the article peer group.

By MICHELLE L. 
PRICE 
WASHINGTON (AP)  President Donald Trump is set to address the nation Thursday night on topics he said will include elections and voting machines, suggesting he is likely to revisit some of the unproven claims he has previously made about Republican losses, particularly his own in 2020. 
Trump’s fixation on his loss to Democrat Joe Biden six years ago and the long-debunked theories he’s circulated about it are things he still brings up regularly when discussing other subjects. 
But elevating the deeply political and conspiratorial topics to a presidential primetime address underscores the lengths to which Trump has used his second term to both blow past norms and fixate on old grievances. 
Trump has offered only vague details about the address, scheduled for 9 p.m. 
ET. 
When asked by a reporter Tuesday if it would concern “election machines and integrity,” Trump said it would “concern that subject” and “we’ll have a couple of other things to say also.” 
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Thursday afternoon: “President Trump will deliver a major address to the nation on protecting the integrity of our elections. 
And we encourage every American to tune in.” 
She didn’t offer many details, but said that what the president planned to say “will shock you if you have an honest eye listening to the president tonight” and will make the case that the U.S. will “need to make some adjustments moving forward,” including a strict voter ID bill he has been pushing. 
Primetime presidential addresses are typically reserved for major milestones or nationally significant events. 
Trump last did it in April to speak on the Iran war, a month after it started. 
He said then that the U.S. would accomplish its objectives “very shortly” and that “the hard part is done, so it should be easy.” 
The war, however, has dragged on and strikes between the U.S. and Iran have intensified this week. 
Trump also delivered a politically charged primetime speech in December in which he sought to blame the challenging economic climate on Democrats. 
Some networks will not air it live 
At least some TV networks said Thursday they would not carry the speech live but would air it on their streaming services. 
ABC, NBC and CNN decided not to air the remarks live but to carry them in full on their streaming services and break into network coverage as needed. 
CBS said it was “airing a special report” during the address, but it wasn’t clear if the network would carry it live. 
Networks typically but don’t always choose to carry presidential addresses to the nation live. 
In 2022, when then-President Joe Biden delivered a primetime address full of warnings about Donald Trump and his adherents’ “extreme ideology,” the networks did not carry it live. 
In 2014, the major networks chose to stick with their primetime programming instead of airing an address by then-President Barack Obama on his plans for immigration reform. 
During the press briefing Thursday, Leavitt seemed to be still trying to persuade networks to carry the remarks live, saying, “I think that the mainstream media should air the president’s speech and allow the American people to draw their own conclusions from it.” 
Leavitt said Trump may use his remarks to also address the economy and Iran, saying, “We have had conversations about him addressing a range of topics, and that could very well be possible tonight.” 
Raising questions about the midterms 
Democrats warned that Trump was trying to revive false claims of past stolen elections in order to delegitimize the 2026 midterm elections, in which Trump’s Republican Party is facing headwinds. 
“Trump is going to use a primetime address to stoke misleading claims about our elections in order to justify interfering in our midterms. 
It’s on all of us to follow the facts and not accept his constant stream of misdirections and lies,” Virginia Democratic Sen. 
Mark Warner said in a statement on X. 
“Trump is again trying to drum up baseless election conspiracies ahead of the November elections,” New Jersey Democratic Sen. 
Andy Kim said in a post on X. 
“Americans are tired of endless war, skyrocketing gas prices, and a president that isn’t looking out for them. 
Voters will make their voices heard, whether Trump wants them to or not.” 
Leavitt didn’t answer a question Thursday about whether Trump would accept the results of the midterms, though Vice President JD Vance told reporters on Capitol Hill a day earlier that “of course we’re gonna support the results of the midterm elections.” 
Vance bristled Wednesday when asked if he’d encourage Trump in his Thursday remarks to stay focused on November’s midterm elections rather than relitigate past elections. 
“’The unfounded claims,’” Vance said, repeating the reporter’s language. 
“You’re basically assuming an answer in the very question that you ask.” 
“The president is going to talk about a number of things tomorrow night. 
I’m obviously not going to get ahead of his remarks,” Vance said. 
“But we can talk about a number of the American people’s problems. 
We can solve a number of the American people’s problems.” 
Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., told reporters he doesn’t know what Trump is going to say. 
“But,” he said, “the only thing I can tell you is that we are focused on the 2026 election, at least I am, and I think most of my colleagues are.” 
*Associated Press writers Mary Clare Jalonick and Will Weissert in Washington and Jocelyn Noveck in New York contributed to this report. 
* 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 8.9%The Associated Press: 2.8%Baltimore Sun: 1.9%Confirmation Bias8.9%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 1.4%Baltimore Sun: 1.1%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 11.1%The Associated Press: 3.2%Baltimore Sun: 2.5%Availability Heuristic11.1%This article: 4.4%The Associated Press: 0.9%Baltimore Sun: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic4.4%This article: 5.1%The Associated Press: 0.6%Baltimore Sun: 0.4%Hindsight Bias5.1%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 1.8%Baltimore Sun: 0.9%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 13.6%The Associated Press: 11.1%Baltimore Sun: 4.3%Framing Effect13.6%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.6%Baltimore Sun: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.7%Baltimore Sun: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%Baltimore Sun: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 2.5%The Associated Press: 3.1%Baltimore Sun: 2.3%Optimism Bias2.5%This article: 3.7%The Associated Press: 1.7%Baltimore Sun: 1.2%Pessimism Bias3.7%This article: 26.1%The Associated Press: 11.0%Baltimore Sun: 7.6%Negativity Bias26.1%This article: 4.5%The Associated Press: 2.2%Baltimore Sun: 0.8%Self-Serving Bias4.5%This article: 2.4%The Associated Press: 1.2%Baltimore Sun: 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error2.4%This article: 2.7%The Associated Press: 0.2%Baltimore Sun: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias2.7%This article: 7.7%The Associated Press: 2.2%Baltimore Sun: 0.6%In-Group Bias7.7%This article: 3.3%The Associated Press: 1.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias3.3%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 1.9%Baltimore Sun: 1.7%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 1.8%The Associated Press: 2.0%Baltimore Sun: 1.5%Recency Bias1.8%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.4%Baltimore Sun: 0.2%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%Baltimore Sun: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 16.5%The Associated Press: 0.9%Baltimore Sun: 0.3%Ad Hominem16.5%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.2%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 4.6%The Associated Press: 3.8%Baltimore Sun: 2.5%Appeal to Authority4.6%This article: 3.0%The Associated Press: 1.2%Baltimore Sun: 1.2%False Dilemma3.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.8%Baltimore Sun: 0.5%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 5.2%The Associated Press: 3.0%Baltimore Sun: 3.4%Hasty Generalization5.2%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.3%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 4.7%The Associated Press: 0.5%Baltimore Sun: 0.2%Bandwagon4.7%This article: 10.1%The Associated Press: 5.6%Baltimore Sun: 3.7%Appeal to Emotion10.1%This article: 3.8%The Associated Press: 0.8%Baltimore Sun: 0.6%Begging the Question3.8%This article: 1.8%The Associated Press: 2.8%Baltimore Sun: 2.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)1.8%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 5.1%The Associated Press: 0.5%Baltimore Sun: 0.3%Burden of Proof5.1%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 1.3%The Associated Press: 0.1%Baltimore Sun: 0.2%Composition/Division1.3%This article: 2.9%The Associated Press: 1.3%Baltimore Sun: 1.3%Anecdotal2.9%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 1.0%The Associated Press: 1.7%Baltimore Sun: 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)1.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%Baltimore Sun: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.2%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.2%Baltimore Sun: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.9%The Associated Press: 1.8%Baltimore Sun: 1.5%Unattributed Quote0.9%This article: 1.9%The Associated Press: 1.2%Baltimore Sun: 0.5%Quote-first Misdirection1.9%This article: 3.3%The Associated Press: 3.9%Baltimore Sun: 3.3%Biased Writer Voice3.3%This article: 5.8%The Associated Press: 0.7%Baltimore Sun: 2.1%Indoctrination5.8%This article: 9.3%The Associated Press: 0.8%Baltimore Sun: 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias9.3%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.3%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.4%Baltimore Sun: 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

928 words analyzed.

Speakers

5speakers35%attributed speech606writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 47 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageKaroline Leavitt • 26 words • 0.0% coverageKaroline Leavitt • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 54 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageKaroline Leavitt • 43 words • 0.0% coverageKaroline Leavitt • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 100.0% coverageMark Warner • 23 words • 0.0% coverageMark Warner • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageAndy Kim • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageAndy Kim • 18 words • 100.0% coverageAndy Kim • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 41 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageJD Vance • 9 words • 0.0% coverageJD Vance • 12 words • 0.0% coverageJD Vance • 13 words • 0.0% coverageJD Vance • 12 words • 0.0% coverageJD Vance • 12 words • 0.0% coverageJD Vance • 10 words • 0.0% coverageJohn Thune • 17 words • 0.0% coverageJohn Thune • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Mark Warner

100%flagged-word coverage
45 attributed words14% of attributed speech75% writer coverage
0%7.5%15.0%Politically Left Leaning B-14.2 ptsWriter: 14.2%Mark Warner: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-8.9 ptsWriter: 8.9%Mark Warner: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-5.1 ptsWriter: 5.1%Mark Warner: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-1.3 ptsWriter: 1.3%Mark Warner: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.