Keyword summary
81% 1 analyzed article/video 928 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Election Conspiracies results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20.3% saturation with 565 hits . Analysis detected 3,104 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,784 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 56% (16,830 of 37,536 keywords). This Election Conspiracies is worse (more manipulative) than 55.20% of the peer group. Election Conspiracies
Keyword details
Total words: 2,784
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
55% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 55.2% percentile 3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 10.1% 10.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 5.6% 5.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 12.5% 12.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 20.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 12.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 6.9% Ad Hominem: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 2.2% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 2.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Begging the Question: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.4% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst