Speaker summary
41%7 analyzed articles/videos321.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Adam Sandler results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 19.6% saturation with 98 hits. Analysis detected 351.669 faulty-reasoning hits from 321.333 analyzed words across 7 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 8.1% and a BS Rank of 8% (26,223 of 28,364 speakers). This Adam Sandler is better (less manipulative) than 92.50% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

8% percentile
02550751007.5% percentile
8.1% BS Score7 analyzed videos321.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 2.6%2.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 22.5%22.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 19.6%19.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 4.4%4.4%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 6.0%6.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 2.0%2.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 10.6%10.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 4.4%4.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 5.6%5.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 3.5%3.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Halo Effect: Speaker 22.5%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Speaker 19.6%, sitewide 5.2%Negativity Bias: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 10.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 6.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 3.7%Halo EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate