Publication summary
72% 14 analyzed articles/videos 12,736 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Responsible Statecraft results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 11.3% saturation with 6,072 hits . Analysis detected 44,808 faulty-reasoning hits from 53,869 analyzed words across 14 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 49% (280 of 542 publications). This Responsible Statecraft is better (less manipulative) than 51.60% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 53,869
Article count: 14
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
48% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 48.4% percentile 1.6% BS Score14 analyzed articles53.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 7.6% 7.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 3.4% 3.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 8.5% 8.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 2.9% 2.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 1.5% 1.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 0.4% 0.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 0.4% 0.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Publication 11.3% 11.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 1.4% 1.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Publication 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 7.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 8.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 3.4%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 11.3%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Publication 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 5.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 6.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 4.0%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 3.0%, sitewide 2.0% Pessimism Bias: Publication 2.9%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Slippery Slope: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 1.7% Bandwagon: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst