Author summary
98% 1 analyzed article/video 1,405 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dana Frank results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Biased Writer Voice , and Framing Effect , with Politically Left Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 28.9% saturation with 1,218 hits . Analysis detected 9,001 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,215 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.2% and a BS Rank of 84% (1,029 of 6,341 authors). This Dana Frank is worse (more manipulative) than 83.80% of the peer group. Dana Frank
Author details
Total words: 4,215
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
84% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 83.8% percentile 5.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 28.9% 28.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 19.9% 19.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 20.3% 20.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 18.1% 18.1% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Author 9.4% 9.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.7% 7.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 7.5% 7.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 12.3% 12.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.0% 1.0% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 6.9% 6.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 28.9%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect: Author 18.1%, sitewide 26.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 20.3%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 19.9%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 12.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.0%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 9.7%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Author 9.4%, sitewide 5.2% Straw Man: Author 9.4%, sitewide 0.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.4%, sitewide 9.1% Indoctrination: Author 7.5%, sitewide 0.0% In-Group Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 6.9% False Dilemma: Author 6.9%, sitewide 1.5% Halo Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 4.6%, sitewide 1.1% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.0%, sitewide 0.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 3.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.8%, sitewide 0.0% Hindsight Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 1.4% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Politically Left Leaning Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst