Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,324 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Elfadil Ibrahim results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 564 hits . Analysis detected 3,698 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,296 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 37% (4,024 of 6,348 authors). This Elfadil Ibrahim is better (less manipulative) than 63.40% of the peer group. Elfadil Ibrahim
Author details
Total words: 5,296
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
37% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 36.6% percentile 2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.7% 10.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.0% 8.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.1% 5.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.0% 1.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.1% 0.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 9.6% 9.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 10.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.6%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst