Author summary
46%1 analyzed article/video1,362 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Aurélie Daher results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10.8% saturation with 587 hits. Analysis detected 3,759 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,448 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 58% (3,581 of 8,512 authors). This Aurélie Daher is worse (more manipulative) than 57.90% of the peer group.
Aurélie Daher
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
58%Aurélie Daher (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 5,448
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

58% percentile
025507510057.9% percentile
2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.4%2.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.8%1.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.8%8.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.4%0.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.6%0.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 10.8%10.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.9%2.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.4%1.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.6%1.6%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Author 4.5%4.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 8.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.8%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.8%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 7.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.8%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 4.6%Hindsight Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 1.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 3.1%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Ad Hominem: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.0%Begging the Question: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.5%Straw Man: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos