Author summary
73%1 analyzed article/video969 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Trita Parsi results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 11.2% saturation with 436 hits. Analysis detected 3,731 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,876 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 71% (2,457 of 8,281 authors). This Trita Parsi is worse (more manipulative) than 70.30% of the peer group.
Trita Parsi
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
0%Cleveland Documenters1%
71%Trita Parsi (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,876
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

70% percentile
025507510070.3% percentile
3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 9.5%9.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.5%4.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.3%8.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.4%2.4%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Author 7.7%7.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 11.3%11.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.0%1.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.5%1.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 9.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 8.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.5%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 11.3%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Author 0.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 8.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 8.0%, sitewide 7.5%Slippery Slope: Author 7.7%, sitewide 1.7%In-Group Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 2.0%Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.6%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.4%Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos